Monday, September 05, 2016

Muslims Target Chinese in France For Racial Violence, Chinese Demonstrate

...and the Media dutifully refuses to ID the racist attackers as Muslims.

Funny how it seems that the progressive establishment and its tools invariably favor Muslims over everyone else.  In this case, it favors Muslims over non-Muslim Chinese living in France.  And it seems that the progressive establishment and its tools don't care about racism at all when the racists are Muslims.

Story HERE.

This harassment of the Chinese near Paris has been going on for a long time. It got so bad that at one point the Chinese ambassador to France was forced to pay a visit to Aubervilliers to try to calm his countrymen down. And in 2013, the Socialist mayor of Aubervilliers, Jacques Salvator, suggested that the violence against them could be halted if Chinese companies would agree to hire more Arabs and Africans. The Chinese were not assuaged, countering that “Muslims do not work as hard as the Chinese, that they are more demanding, and that they complain too much.”Anyone familiar with Muslim work habits would need no convincing.

Since that demonstration in Aubervilliers two weeks ago, apparently little has been done to placate the Chinese. They described to reporters covering their demonstration in Paris their feeling of frustration at not being listened to by the French authorities who, they said, fail to realize what kind of daily terror they endure. And in addition to the attacks on Chinese who live in the suburbs, there has been a steady increase in the number of attacks targeting Chinese (and Korean, and Japanese) tourists in central Paris. These Asian tourists are known both to buy luxury goods to take home with them, and to carry lots of cash. Just the other day, a gang of six (unidentified men) jumped onto a bus just about to leave a hotel for the airport, and made off with luxury-filled luggage belonging to the 27 Chinese tourists on board. The attackers in Aubervilliers have been identified as Muslims, but in the stories about attacks on Chinese tourists the criminals are not identified. But reading between the lines suggests that those attacking the tourists, like those known to be attacking the Chinese in Aubervilliers, are Muslims, and for a simple reason: had any of these criminals been French, the press, which tends to protect Muslims, would certainly have been eager to describe them as such. A refusal to identify them, in the current climate, almost certainly means they were Muslims.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

The "Mainstream" Media's Terrible Bias Regarding Left-Wing "Protests"

The media is uncritical of far-left-wing extremist "protestors" (who are almost always phony and frequently paid) who gather en masse at non-left-wing events, including those for non-left-wing politicians (like the US non-establishment Republicans and the Canadian Conservatives, for example). They're uncritical of such "protestors" no matter what the "protestors" say, what their signs say, of even what they do. It doesn't matter if the "protestors" are uttering BIG LIES and DEFAMATION of the absolute worst kind, nor even if they engage in destruction and violence.

But call a left-wing politician a "liar" or a "socialist" or otherwise speak the inconvenient truth of THEM... the media will go out of its way to destroy you and yours in the eyes of the masses.

If there were to be protests against left-wing politicians such as Obama, Hillary, Bernie or, in Canada, Trudeau, Wynne, Notley... including hollering "no hate", "no racism", "no fascism", "they're like Hitler/Nazis", etc... the media would demonize such protestors as, perhaps,  "extremists", "racists", "neo-nazis", "far-left"... or may just pretend that there were no protests at all (in the case of peaceful, truth-based demonstrations, no matter how massive, such as the Tea Party protests against Obama's agenda) or pretend it was just a "couple hundred" when it was thousands strong.  The media may even try to demonize such peaceful, truthful protests as being "a bunch of extremists/racists/far-right".

Anyone disagree? Be prepared to explain why, and state whether one is on top of current events daily, including going over the heads of the "mainstream", politically-correct, leftist media... or not.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

The Problem Isn't Racism, Nor Poverty. Socialism Is The Problem.

Story HERE.

The “legacy of slavery” argument is not just an excuse for inexcusable behavior in the ghettos. In a larger sense, it is an evasion of responsibility for the disastrous consequences of the prevailing social vision of our times, and the political policies based on that vision, over the past half century.

Anyone who is serious about evidence need only compare black communities as they evolved in the first 100 years after slavery with black communities as they evolved in the first 50 years after the explosive growth of the welfare state, beginning in the 1960s.

You would be hard-pressed to find as many ghetto riots prior to the 1960s as we have seen just in the past year, much less in the 50 years since a wave of such riots swept across the country in 1965.

 We are told that such riots are a result of black poverty and white racism. But in fact — for those who still have some respect for facts — black poverty was far worse, and white racism was far worse, prior to 1960. But violent crime within black ghettos was far less.
 You cannot take any people, of any color, and exempt them from the requirements of civilization — including work, behavioral standards, personal responsibility, and all the other basic things that the clever intelligentsia disdain — without ruinous consequences to them and to society at large.

Non-judgmental subsidies of counterproductive lifestyles are treating people as if they were livestock, to be fed and tended by others in a welfare state — and yet expecting them to develop as human beings have developed when facing the challenges of life themselves.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

People Who Believe Big Lies About Israel

...are either motivated by cluelessness, gullibility... or ANTI-SEMITISM.

Frequently all of the above.

So it's extremely RICH when such brainwashed bigots accuse the staunchest supporters, those with the best record thereof, of both Israel and Judaism of being "anti-Semitic" and "racist" for laughable reasons/excuses.


They call Obama "too conservative"

Breaking story here.

Saturday, May 16, 2015

Check Your Arrogance, Broadcasting "Consortium"!

The Globe and Mail, affiliated with the CTV, opines (while failing to indicate that it's opinion with a little factual stuff peppered in, like a blog post)...

First, some actual fact, to be fair and give the article due credit...

A federal election is expected this October, and this Tuesday the Harper Conservatives shook up plans for campaign debates, saying they would refuse to participate in the traditional leaders’ debates run by the consortium of broadcasters and instead take part in as many as five independently staged debates in the run-up to the fall federal election.

Now, for the opinion part...

The decision by Mr. Harper’s Conservatives to walk away from the consortium that has historically run these events will erode the power that major broadcasters have had in determining how federal political leaders face off on TV before elections.

It appears to be an effort by the Tories to decrease the political weight of the debates by splitting them into smaller events with smaller audiences where the Conservatives have more leverage to achieve the format and focus that they feel suits them as a right-of-centre incumbents.

The "Consortium" needs to check its arrogance.  Why do they REALLY think they're FINALLY being snubbed?  You and I know why.  Because they are BIASED and unfair. 

"Widest audience"?  On live TV, including the bunny ears, sure.  BUT...  Hello... INTERNET REPLAY is now a reality!  See the debates on your computer or your phone, too, at your demand and leisure!  So the "Consortium" is mistaken to delude itself into believing that "only it" can be the way to go.  Not anymore, Consortium of commie broadcasters!

Again, Prime Minister Stephen Harper (Conservative) demonstrates precisely HOW to go over the heads of the crony-capitalist,  corruptocratic, politically-correct, unfair-and-unbalanced corporate media, which includes the source for this posting, the G&M, connected via corporate messaging control, as well as simply corporately, to the CTV, which is part of the "Consortium".  And, by the way, the G&M article, which fails to self-ID as "commentary-opinion", rather than hard news, is obviously opinion-compromised.  MY analysis, or the G&M's analysis- whose will you trust?  At least I get NO money for my opinion and it's 100% of my own independent, non-controlled, non-coerced prompting.

Again, the G&M's article demonstrates the core of the trouble with the corporate, big-money, crony-capitalist, controlled, politically-correct, leftwards-biased media:  Combining some fact with a lot of opinion.  And thusly manipulating the lazy-minded masses, who don't like to think for themselves and frequently simply, lazily accept "mainstream" Consortium opinion as if factual statement.

The Left Wing, we know very well, claimed that the now-gone-thanks-to-unfair-treatment-by-the-CRTC (regardless of its head having been appointed by whomever, such appointment proving nothing as to ideological control whatsoever by the federal government, as alleged by the Left in its attempts to blame it all on Conservative control) SUN News was "biased opinion", but failed to accept that there was always a hard-news component, separated from the straight-talk component.  They alleged there was a seamless melding of the news and opinion parts, a big lie they told out of dishonesty... while failing to admit that the "Consortium" is itself guilty of doing this with staggering frequency.

This new way of going about election debates is refreshing, groundbreaking and progressive due to contemporary technology.  So the "Consortium" is just being arrogant.  Too bloody bad for the "Consortium".

Watch the debates live on cable, or wait a little bit to see them online at your demand.  That's the way things are... now.  Who needs the dinosaury, arrogant, manipulative-messaging "Consortium" anyway, anymore?

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Barack Hussein Obama: Fabian Society Puppet



Barack Obama is a Fabian socialist. I should know; I was raised by one. My Grandfather worked as a union machinist for Ingersoll Rand during the day. In the evenings he tended bar and read books. After his funeral, I went back home and started working my way through his library, starting with T.W. Arnold’s The Folklore of Capitalism. This was my introduction to the Fabian socialists.

Fabians believed in gradual nationalization of the economy through manipulation of the democratic process. Breaking away from the violent revolutionary socialists of their day, they thought that the only real way to effect “fundamental change” and “social justice” was through a mass movement of the working classes presided over by intellectual and cultural elites. Before TV it was stage plays, written by George Bernard Shaw and thousands of inferior “realist” playwrights dedicated to social change. John Cusack’s character in Woody Allen’s “Bullets Over Broadway” captures the movement rather well.

Arnold taught me to question everyone–my president, my priest and my parents. Well, almost everyone. I wasn’t supposed to question the Fabian intellectuals themselves. That’s the Fabian MO, relentless cultural and journalistic attacks on everything that is, and then a hard pitch for the hope of what might be.

That’s Obama’s world.

He’s telling the truth when he says that he doesn’t agree with Bill Ayers’ violent bombing tactics, but it’s a tactical disagreement. Why use dynamite when mass media and community organizing work so much better? Who needs Molotov when you’ve got Saul Alinski?

See also...

Obama the wolf in sheep’s clothing on Fabian Window Coat of Arms!

 As Canada Free Press columnist William Kevin Stoos wrote here yesterday.  “The Fabian Window is a beautiful, if sinister, thing.  Although it currently hangs in London, it should be hanging in the White House, for the message in the window is an eerie reflection of what is happening in the United States before our very eyes.  Built to commemorate the founding of the Fabian Socialist Society, the Fabian Window contains images that are clear, unapologetic and, as a friend of mine once said..brazen.  It is one thing, as Lenin said, to howl like wolves in order to live among wolves; however it is quite another to advertise the fact that you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing.  Yet, the socialists who constructed the window had no qualms about advertising the fact that they had a hidden (or not so hidden) agenda when it comes to reshaping the world.”

The wolf at the door is not a Made in America problem.  It is a made in the Free World problem.
The Fabian Society casts all doubt aside about what Obama really is: He’s the quintessential Socialist wolf in sheep’s clothing being used to shape a new world.

Not only Obama, but also Justin Trudeau (just like his father Pierre Trudeau).  Obviously.

Monday, April 06, 2015

Islamic Supremacists Infiltrate UK Schools AS Teachers

Story HERE.

According to the 'The Sunday Times', the schools were the focus of the Trojan Horse scandal, which saw efforts by hardline Islamists to take control of state schools.

The NCTL is reportedly examining 30 cases with an expectation that many more will follow, as many as 100.

Allegations under investigation include claims that an al-Qaeda style video was copied at Park View Academy, one of the schools involved in the Trojan Horse affair, and that teachers punished children by making them kneel on tiles.

More than 50 staff members in schools across Birmingham also allegedly exchanged messages in a WhatsApp group which included homophobic remarks, offensive comments about British soldiers, claims that the murder of soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, southeast London, was a hoax, and discussion of segregating boys and girls.

Wow... can't have any kind of scumbags as teachers.  No way.  Especially supremacists who believe in mass murder of people who are different.  This left-wing bullshit cannot be tolerated.

Thursday, April 02, 2015

Double Standard: 13 Gay Bakers Refuse Service To Christian!

"Shhhhh!  We're gay and don't serve Christians here!  We HATE them!"

Shoe's on the other foot, and a bakers' dozen of homosexual bakers demonstrates its hypocrisy towards a Christian who demanded cakes from them that would've violated THEIR beliefs and rights.

But will the Leftist State Apparatus force the homosexual flour sifters to either do what violates their creed, or else be forced out of business... just like the gays keep on doing to Christian bakers, demanding wedding cakes from them, but never, ever from bakers of any other faith?

Story HERE.

No one targeted pro-gay bakeries, but gay activists target Christian bakeries. “Support Gay Marriage” is one Christian bakery was sued for refusing to put that slogan on a cake for an event to support the gay agenda. Yet Christian bakeries that refuse to make pro-homosexual marriage cakes are getting sued left, right, and center.  They get fined, they get death threats, and they lose their businesses. This experiment proves beyond doubt that the gay agenda is not just about their freedom to practice a sexual orientation, but the suppression of free speech.

To make our case we provided 3 video clips, the third one is a video showing homosexual activists in Ireland used the state to force a Christian bakery to make a cake with the slogan “Support Gay Marriage” for a pro-gay marriage event, but he refused which added a tremendous loss to his business. Several Christian bakeries were sued in the United States with several who lost their businesses and we said enough is enough.

So decided to call some 13 prominent pro-gay bakers in a row. Each one denied us the right to have “Gay Marriage Is Wrong” on a cake and even used deviant insults and obscenities against us. One baker even said all sorts of profanities against Christians and ended the conversation by saying that she will make me a cookie with a large phallus on it.

Aren't you tired of smug liberal brainwashees smugly telling you that "gays and lesbians" are the nicest people on earth with impeccable character content who wouldn't discriminate against a fly?  Me too.  Many, many, many of them are simply intolerant, bigoted hypocrites.

Interesting how the gay militant activists from the Hard Left Wing of society only target Christian bakers for this harassment and abuse, but never any other bakers of other-than-Christian faith.  It's as if Christians are the exclusive targets of the GLBT revolutionaries and the Hard Left.  In fact, j'accuse the GLBTs and the Left Wing of doing precisely that!

Turnabout is fair play.  Exposing hypocritical, hateful bigots, no matter how exalted by political correctness they may be, is fun and just!

Wednesday, April 01, 2015

Charges Against Christian Preacher Dropped: WRONGFULLY CHARGED.

The police made a mistake, it seems.  Let's hope it was honest confusion on their part and nothing sinister, nothing motivated by Christianophobic prejudice.

Story HERE.

Last year, Rev. David Lynn was charged with "busking" at Toronto's Yonge & Dundas Square while he was preaching.

The good news is, these charges have just been dropped. Lynn and his lawyer talk about their efforts to help restore Rev. Lynn's religious rights.